Monday 26 January 2015

What makes “the last prophet” so unorthodox?


In my studies of religions it has been quite a revelation to me that there is a lot more to a religion than simply believing statements of faith. Of course I need not have studied anything to come to this realization, I myself have been a part of a religious community from birth. Along with any religion comes a community of believers, comes festal gatherings, feasts, fasts, singing and so many other familiar rituals and rites of passage. We humans are sentimental creatures by nature and so when we defend our beliefs we are not simply defending what we "believe" but also the memories, the culture and the community that we are a part of.

There is what can be dangerous in religion I think. Our experience is a bit like living in a box. Everything that we learn about our system of belief, the history of our religion and of our holy men comes to us from within the box. What I mean is that all this information is communicated to us by people who are inside our religion. To illustrate this point, I have learned about the beliefs of some very eccentric cults in America founded by outrageously immoral men. There is absolutely no way in which anyone would choose to become a member of these religions if they made their decision with access to all of the facts about the founder of the religion and how its belief system developed into what it is today. So then how do people get caught up in them? Well, because all the information that was presented to them came from "within the box", they got air-brushed accounts of all the information upon which they made their decision. Once inside the fold or maybe having grown up in the religion they become immune to any criticism of it because all they ever hear about it comes from those who are themselves involved in it. Any outside person trying to reason with such a person would be immediately rejected because his accusations not only threaten to undermine the system of belief but the person's very identity itself.

My particular interest is in the"Abrahamic Faiths". By Abrahamic faiths I am referring to: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. These three religions share the same root, that of the man Abraham. In essence, Christianity and Islam are branches springing from the tree of Judaism. Jesus, the hero of the Christian faith, is claimed by them (and Islam) to be the Messiah prophesied by the holy men in the Jewish tradition. Mohammed, the hero of the Islamic faith, is claimed by them to be a prophet/reformer sent by God to bring all of his faithful back to the truth which has been perverted and deserted by the Christians and the Jews.

The purpose of this article is to investigate the claims of this last man to arrive on the scene - Mohammed, because his words have serious implications for those belonging to the other two Faiths. Indeed Mohammed had a lot to say to both Christians and Jews,

                "O People of the Book! Now hath come unto you, making (things)
                clear unto you, Our Messenger, after the break in (the series of) our
                messengers, lest ye should say: "There came unto us no bringer of glad
                tidings and no warner (from evil)": But now hath come unto you a bringer
                of glad tidings and a warner (from evil)." (Quran 5:19)

Mohammed sees himself at the end of a long and well respected line of "messengers" from God calling his people back to righteousness. What I hope to highlight here is how unique he was when compared with the prophets who came before him. As we begin to look at the words of Mohammed it does not seem at first that he wants to overturn the authority of the Scriptures that have come before him. He says,

                "Lo! We did reveal the Torah, wherein is guidance and a light, by
                which the prophets who surrendered (unto Allah) judged the Jews, and the
                rabbis and the priests (judged) by such of Allah's Scripture as they were
                bidden to observe, and thereunto were they witnesses."  (Quran 5:44)

And to the Christians he says,

                "And in their footsteps We sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming
                the Law that had come before him: We sent him the Gospel: therein was
                guidance and light, and confirmation of the Law that had come before him:
                a guidance and an admonition to those who fear Allah." (Quran 5:46)

So if this is what Mohammed says about himself and the Holy Scriptures, I would expect that he would have gone about encouraging people everywhere to come back to God and obey the Scriptures that have been given as the other reformer prophets did before him, but this was not to be.

With previous prophets of the Biblical tradition, their messages were transcribed and gradually added to the collection of prophetic writings after those who heard them had made absolutely certain that they were in fact the real thing and not just pretending to speak for God. This is what I find truly unique about the situation with Mohammed. His words were not added to the Bible along with those of the prophets that came before him, instead he says,

                "O people of the Book! There hath come to you our Messenger,
                revealing to you much that ye used to hide in the Book, and passing over
                much (that is now unnecessary): There hath come to you from Allah a (new)
                light and a perspicuous Book" (Quran 5:15)

One book to replace them all! In practice we find that rather than bring people back to an established religion, Mohammed has for many people replaced it with his own. So when Mohammed references a passage from the Torah, it is this reinterpreted text that replaces the original one and Muslims do not feel obliged to look it up in the original text. Have a look at this passage from the Quran where Mohammed quotes a passage from the Torah,

                "Allah did aforetime take a covenant from the Children of Israel,
                and we appointed twelve captains among them. And Allah said: "I am with
                you: if ye (but) establish regular prayers, practise regular charity,
                believe in my messengers, honour and assist them, and loan to Allah a
                beautiful loan, verily I will wipe out from you your evils, and admit you
                to gardens with rivers flowing beneath; but if any of you, after this,
                resisteth faith, he hath truly wandered from the path or rectitude." (Quran 5:12 )

If you had to search the Torah to find the words that Mohammed is referring to (as I did), you will find the following words instead,

"Now these are the commandments, the statutes, and the judgments, which the LORD your God commanded to teach you, that ye might do them in the land whither ye go to possess it: That thou mightest fear the LORD thy God, to keep all his statutes and his commandments, which I command thee, thou, and thy son, and thy son's son, all the days of thy life; and that thy days may be prolonged. Hear therefore, O Israel, and observe to do it; that it may be well with thee, and that ye may increase mightily, as the LORD God of thy fathers hath promised thee, in the land that floweth with milk and honey."     (Deut 6)

You will not find mention in the Torah of "regular prayers", "regular charity" or a "loan to Allah". What we have in Muhammad’s quote or summary of the verse are parts of the “Five pillars of Islam". Not only is Mohammed unique among the prophets by presenting one new book to replace them all, he is also unique in the way he reinterprets the Scriptures which went before him in order to bring his new message. Mohammed went on to say,

"when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic." (Quran 6:6)

Now, again, I am not sure if this is intended to be a direct quotation or a summary of the text, but if you search the Gospel of Jesus you will find that the only verse which refers to someone who comes after Jesus is this one,

"And I will pray to the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." (John 14:16,17)

The name "Ahmad" [Praised One] in the Quranic verse, is used by Mohammed to refer to himself. Mohammed is claiming here that Jesus prophesied that he would come. Could Mohammed be quoting this verse from the gospel of John? Surely not because if this verse is referring to Mohammed then how could the disciples of Jesus have known him at that time considering that Mohammed was not yet born? How could it be that he (Mohammed) "dwelleth with you, and shall be in you"? Quite apart from these inconsistencies there is the interpretation of this promise in the rest of the Bible itself. The Bible later records that the fulfillment of this prophecy happened after Jesus' ascension at the outpouring of the Holy Spirit which is recorded in the Book of Acts. How do we resolve this mystery? Can it be that Mohammed has also reinterpreted Jesus’ prophecy which is recorded in his Gospel? This puts Mohammed in the rather interesting position of being the one to both reinterpret the prophecy (by divine inspiration of an angel) and the person to fulfill it.

Large portions of the Biblical story have been reinterpreted in the Quran. It is not true to say that the Quran is a retelling of the Biblical story with only a few minor revisions. Neither is it intended to "supplement" the established Scriptures, this is evident in the fact that neither the Torah nor the Gospel of Christ are read in Mosque along with the Quran. It seems that the very unorthodox style of this late prophet has put us in the rather uncomfortable position of having to choose between the Bible and his Quran.

What is not unique about the prophet Mohammed is the scathing tone which he directed towards the "apostate" Jews and Christians.  Joseph Smith Jr was one of a of host men who adopted a similar tone and message after the visit which he received from the angel Moroni in 1827. A book inscribed on golden plates came with this angelic visit. Smith Jr dutifully transcribed the words from the plates into plain English. The resulting holy book came to be called the Book of Mormon. The resulting religion which was called the "Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints" (or Mormonism) also holds that it has Abrahamic roots. It says of itself, "Mormonism is Christianity; Christianity is Mormonism... Mormons are true Christians." (from Mormon Doctrine) The prophet, Joseph Smith Jr, the new religion and the holy book that came with it suffered intense persecution at the outset but has prospered regardless and is today a very healthy and respectable religion with a following of over nine million people and a representation world-wide.

Why do I mention this? Only because I think it sheds some light on the very hotly contested title of 'the last prophet'. Mohammed assured us that he would be the last prophet that God sent us, but even before him we have these words of Jesus regarding prophets who would come after him,

        "Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved." Mat 24:9-13

Who are we to believe then? Are we to believe that Jesus prophesied another prophet to come who would bring us back to the truth, as the Quran tells us, or are we to believe that he said that the prophets to come after him would be false, as the Bible says?

In defense of the truth of the Quran many Muslims say that God gave his messenger the Quran because the Bible had been corrupted and could no longer be trusted (although I am yet to find a compelling verse in the Quran to make this case). I am not sure if people who make this argument are aware of how inconsistent this view is with the history of God’s dealings with his people. There have been many times in history when the people of God turned their backs on him and walked in evil. In those times of rebellion God would send his prophets to turn his people back to himself. It has always been people that have been inconsistent, but God says about himself, “I the Lord do not change.” (Mal 3:6) Not only is he unchanging but his words which are revealed to us through the prophets cannot be changed. The prophet David wrote, The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” (Psalms 12:6) I have spoken of the Gospel of Jesus, what of his words? Can they be changed? He says, "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away." Mat 24:35


My point is that the Scriptures that we have received from God are one of the few reliable gifts from God by which we can judge what is true and what is false, what is good and what is evil. I will trust the Scriptures before I trust any man, and I believe that is the way God intended it. Any holy man, priest, prophet or preacher must first be subjected to the full scrutiny of Scripture, without immunity. It is for the Scriptures to judge people, not for a person to stand in judgment of the Scriptures. The accusation that people have in some way altered God’s holy Scriptures is more a reflection of the accuser's low view of God (the ultimate author and preserver of His Scriptures) than it is of the current validity and authority of the Scriptures. If we cannot at least be sure of the unchanging nature of the Scriptures then our guiding light, our true north is lost forever. If the Scriptures can be changed then what is to stop me from standing up tomorrow and announcing, "Mohammed did a great job restoring all of God's words to us, but it has been hundreds of years since then and not only was the Torah tampered with by the Jews, the Gospel adapted by the Christians but now the Quran has also been corrupted by the Muslims. The good news is that an angel visited me last night..." Jesus held the view that the role of the last prophet is not  to have the final word  and to overturn all that has come before. He said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” Mat 5:17

No comments:

Post a Comment