If you are not an avid reader and you are
not interested in reading this whole post, my short answer to the question, ‘Can
love be measured?’ is - not only do I think that love can be measured but I
think we do measure it unconsciously, all the time! We even try and communicate
this in subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) ways. When I’m teaching nouns in
my English class, I always explain that nouns are naming words and that they
usually name things which we can touch and feel. Then (as every good English teacher does) I qualify
that nouns also name some things which cannot be touched, like emotions, like
love. But what if we had to think about love as something which was
quantifiable, like any other substance (am I walking on hallowed ground here?),
not to an exact amount, but at least to the extent where we could use words
like “little”, “more” and “much” when comparing it. I am getting ahead of
myself already you see? For I am assuming that I can use the same words that I
might use to compare, say, sand, or something. Should I rather be speaking
about love like it were a kind of wealth and use words like “cheap”, “average”
and “expensive”? I don’t know. What I am
learning is to think of love as though it were a kind of energy source. With
enough of this fuel I am able to do certain things that without love are very
difficult or impossible to do.
Now I said earlier that I think we measure
people’s love all the time without really thinking about it. Think about this
scenario. If your car runs out of petrol just out of town, who do you call?
Probably the person who loves you the most, right? Well how would you measure
who loves you the most? Kinda makes you think doesn’t it? We have so many
different kinds of relationships with people and the word “love” is used so
liberally. What I want to know is, what brings a friend with a can full of petrol way out there to where
you are sitting next to the freeway in the baking hot sun? There are lots of people on your friend list that you could cross off for
that kind of favour I’m sure!
The longer I experience life, the more I am
convinced that love is the kind of energy that prompts people to action. The
less love we have, the less resolve we have to move into action. There are some
relationships which we will have where there is a kind of warm comradery, but
when you are moving your furniture into your new house, they are the last people
who you think to call. There are some others who you feel you could ask, but
when you do they make noises that they will be there but very seldom or never
are. So you convince yourself that somewhere deep in their hearts they do love
you and that your request just came at a particularly difficult time for them
(ha!) Is there such a thing as a really loving person who never gives help when
you need it? Probably not.
This brings me to the heart of the matter I
think. The measure of love is sacrifice. Love is the energy that empowers me to
serve another person. The amount of times I choose to put my good intentions into
action is the true value of my love. When we try to communicate how much we
love our “special other” (and here I speak from personal experience ;- ) it
inevitably dissolves into promises of fidelity, commitment and then finally,
[singing]
“Cause baby,
There ain't no mountain high enough
Ain't no valley low enough
Ain't no river wide enough
To keep me from getting to you!”
And what a great song that is too. (But
that’s a topic for another blog…) If that one is a bit too old-school for your
taste, why not try a bit of Bruno Mars,
“You know I’d catch a grenade for yaaaaaaaa”
Why do we go there? Why do we end up
speaking about crossing high mountains and swimming across wide rivers and
catching grenades when we try to communicate the extent of our love? I think
it’s like a universally understood truth that the harder the circumstances, the
tougher the task, the greater the sacrifice, the more readily the circumstance
offers itself as an opportunity for love to show it’s true colours. I think
true love is much less about having good times together and enjoying each
others company than it is about serving each other.
What really got me started on this topic
were a few things that Jesus had to say to the churches in the book of
Revelation. To each church he speaks about their “works”. Now that would seem
like a strange thing to speak about seeing as though we are no longer saved by
good works. But Jesus almost used the actions of these people’s lives as a
litmus test to measure how much they loved Him. In fact there was not a single
church to which he says, “Hey guys, you may not look like you love me by your
lifestyles, but don’t worry, I can see the love in your hearts and I know that
you mean well.” He also says in another place, “Greater love has no man than
this, that he lay down his life for his friend.” So on a scale of “little”,
“more” and “much”, dying for the person that you love tops the scale.
That’s why we’ll wake up every two hours of
the night to feed the baby, why we’ll quietly suffer the arrogant teenagers
until they learn humility, why we get to church early to setup, why we make an
effort to blunt the prickly parts of our personalities and learn to listen more
than we speak, that’s why we are not only willing but eager to get up and fetch
someone from the airport at short notice when it’s just gone mid-night (ok, but
that one’s for girlfriends only, no chancers please), it’s because of love,
genuine love.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*Afterthought: My intention with this post
is not to give us a scale by which to measure the love of others, I am
exploring what love is and what true love looks like because I think it is
often misunderstood. No judging please! J
No comments:
Post a Comment